Video: Algeria from the Security Council podium: "Thank you, Israel"
Amar Ben Jamaa, Algeria's UN representative, faced controversy for allowing the Israeli representative to speak during a Security Council meeting. His actions raised questions about diplomatic obligations and political motivations. While criticized domestically for perceived concessions on the Palestinian cause, Ben Jamaa reaffirmed Algeria's commitment to Palestine and its diplomatic strategy.
HASSAN BENYOUB 
Recently, a significant controversy erupted following the actions of Amar Ben Jamaa, Algeria's permanent representative to the United Nations, during a Security Council meeting. His decision not to refuse the floor to the Israeli representative and to remain in the meeting has raised questions about his motivations and the implications of his actions.
https://x.com/Pirana_dusahara/status/1875966383978389680
Reasons for Not Refusing or Withdrawing
- Diplomatic Commitment: Ben Jamaa's choice to neither refuse to give the floor nor withdraw may stem from a diplomatic obligation that requires UN member states to engage with all parties, including Israel. The Security Council serves as a global platform for addressing international issues, and withdrawing or refusing could be seen as inappropriate within the context of diplomatic engagement.
- Avoiding Escalation: It is possible that the Algerian representative aimed to prevent escalating tensions during the meeting. Withdrawing or refusing could lead to further strain in relations between Algeria and Israel, potentially negatively impacting Algeria's stance on other peace and regional security issues.
- Political Considerations: Algeria seeks to reinforce its position as a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause. By allowing the Israeli representative to speak, this action could be interpreted as a step towards fostering dialogue regarding the Palestinian issue rather than isolating itself.
Reactions
- Domestic Condemnation: This stance has sparked condemnation among certain political and public circles in Algeria, with some viewing the allowance for Israel to speak as a concession of Algeria's longstanding positions on the Palestinian cause.
- Affirmation of Official Positions: Despite this controversy, Ben Jamaa emphasized in his speech Algeria's unwavering support for Palestine and its rejection of any normalization attempts with Israel, reflecting Algeria’s ongoing policy of non-recognition of Israel.
Conclusion
Amar Ben Jamaa's decision not to refuse the Israeli representative's speech and his choice to remain in the meeting highlight the complexities of international diplomacy that sometimes necessitate unexpected actions. While this behavior is contentious within Algeria, it may be interpreted as part of a broader strategy aimed at enhancing dialogue on regional and international issues while maintaining Algeria's steadfast position on the Palestinian cause.
