Silence in the Face of Aggression: Algeria's Dilemma at the UN on Ukraine's Actions in Mali
This article delves into the perplexing silence of Algeria's representative at the United Nations regarding Ukraine's recent military actions in Mali. Despite a joint condemnation from Mali and its Sahelian neighbors, Algeria has refrained from calling for an emergency Security Council meeting to address the situation. The piece explores the implications of this inaction, questioning whether Algeria is prioritizing its political interests over the collective concerns of African nations. It highlights the complexities of international diplomacy, the challenges faced by African states in asserting their sovereignty, and the strategic calculations that underpin Algeria's diplomatic stance. As tensions rise, the article invites readers to consider the broader ramifications of this silence on Africa's representation in global governance.
HASSAN BENYOUB 
The absence of a Security Council meeting regarding Ukraine's actions in Mali raises significant questions about international diplomacy and the representation of African interests in global governance. Despite a recent attack on Mali by Ukraine, which has been officially condemned by the Malian government and other Sahel nations, Algeria's representative to the UN has not called for an emergency session to address this issue.
Context of the Situation
Three weeks ago, Ukraine launched an operation against Mali, a country that is not only geographically distant but also outside the European sphere of influence. This military action has been met with outrage from Mali and its neighbors, who view it as an infringement on their sovereignty and a potential support for terrorism in the region. The joint statement from Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, sent to the Security Council just days ago, underscores the urgency of the situation and the need for international attention.
Algeria's Stance
Algeria, representing Africa in the Security Council, has a critical role in advocating for the continent's interests. However, the Algerian representative's silence on convening a meeting to discuss Ukraine's actions is telling. Observers suggest that this reluctance may stem from Algeria's internal political dynamics and its relationship with Ukraine. The current Algerian administration, led by President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, is perceived to prioritize its own political interests over the broader concerns of African nations.By not addressing the issue, Algeria risks being complicit in the narrative that supports external intervention in African affairs, particularly when such interventions are linked to accusations of terrorism. If the Security Council were to condemn Ukraine's actions, Algeria's involvement in facilitating Ukrainian operations on its soil could come under scrutiny, further complicating its diplomatic standing.
Strategic Implications
The strategic implications of this situation are profound. The reluctance of Algeria to act may reflect a broader geopolitical calculation, balancing its ties with Western powers who support Ukraine against the need to uphold African solidarity. The dynamics within the Security Council, where major powers often wield significant influence, complicate the ability of smaller nations to advocate effectively for their interests.Moreover, the lack of action from the Algerian representative raises questions about the effectiveness of African nations in the UN framework, particularly when their sovereignty is threatened. This situation highlights the ongoing challenges faced by African states in securing a voice in international forums that often prioritize the interests of more powerful nations.
Conclusion
The current inaction regarding Ukraine's aggression in Mali is emblematic of the complexities of international relations, where moral imperatives often clash with political realities. Algeria's hesitance to convene a Security Council meeting not only reflects its internal political calculations but also raises critical questions about the representation of African interests in global governance. As the situation evolves, it remains to be seen whether Algeria will shift its stance or continue to prioritize its political alliances over the urgent needs of its African neighbors.
